Material into an outline

Think it through first,
then start writing.

Scattered material becomes an outline you can write from: one core argument, a section structure, the points each section carries, and an explicit gap list. No invented research data, quotations, or case studies — missing evidence is written as an item to supply, with a note on what is needed.

One argumentOrdered structureGaps left blank
01

Paste source material

0 / 12,000 charactersMinimum 80

Content is used only for this AI request and is not intentionally stored by this site.

02

Review the outline

Your result will appear here

We derive the core argument, break out the section structure, list the points each section must carry, and set the evidence gaps and missing material apart.

SAMPLE OUTPUT

Here is exactly what you receive.

This is the complete output for the source text in the demo above: a structure score, itemised reasoning, the material to supply before writing, and the structured outline. It is a demonstration, not a customer case.

SAMPLE

Outline result (sample)

Structure score88/100
+50
01

Turn a topic into a checkable argument slot

The source only says people care about the topic, with no claim. The outline sets the core argument apart as to confirm and states what would settle it.

02

Break vague evidence into specific gaps

“A study said productivity went up quite a bit” cannot be checked. It becomes three named requirements: source, sample, and measure.

03

Leave unnamed examples as items to supply

“A few company examples” gives no company and no public material, so it stays a gap with a note on what is needed instead of an invented case.

Structured outline
# Remote work: outline draft

**Core argument**: [TO CONFIRM - the material states no claim]

## Section structure
1. What is in scope
2. What people do today
3. The available evidence
4. Limits and exceptions

## Points per section
- Section 1: define fully remote versus hybrid; source of the definition [TO SUPPLY]
- Section 3: needs a checkable productivity source, sample, and measure [TO SUPPLY]

## Gaps
- No core argument: the material says people care, not what the piece claims
- “A study said productivity went up” has no source and no measure [TO SUPPLY]
- “A few company examples” names no company and cites no public material [TO SUPPLY]

WHAT OUTLINING DOES

Not thinking for you. Putting what you have in order.

01

Settle one argument first

The first line of the outline is what the piece claims. When the material has no claim, it says to confirm — it does not invent one.

02

Order the points

Each section states which points it makes and in what order, so the writing stage never has to solve structure again.

03

Leave missing evidence blank

When a section needs a figure or a case and the material has none, it becomes an item to supply with a note on what is missing — never sample data.

WHY IT IS WORTH DOING

Stalling halfway usually means it was never clear.

01

A pile of material is not an argument

You have fifteen excerpts and still cannot say what the piece claims, so drafting keeps stalling.

02

Missing evidence becomes fake data

Leave “put a number here” in the outline and by the drafting stage it has quietly become an invented figure.

03

Clear structure makes writing fast

Once each section's points are settled, drafting is just finishing sentences instead of deciding what comes next.

Note: a common writing practice is to settle the core claim first and then build the structure and points around it; exact methods vary by writer and subject. This site organises only the material you supply. It does not retrieve external sources, does not invent studies, reports, or institutions, and gives no professional advice.

OUTLINE DEMO

The same material, outlined.

Before

We want to write a piece about remote work. It feels like people really care about the topic, and I think a study said productivity went up quite a bit. We could give a few company examples. Details later.

Outlined
# Remote work: outline draft

**Core argument**: [TO CONFIRM - the material states no claim]

## Section structure
1. What is in scope
2. What people do today
3. The available evidence
4. Limits and exceptions

## Points per section
- Section 1: define fully remote versus hybrid; source of the definition [TO SUPPLY]
- Section 3: needs a checkable productivity source, sample, and measure [TO SUPPLY]

## Gaps
- No core argument: the material says people care, not what the piece claims
- “A study said productivity went up” has no source and no measure [TO SUPPLY]
- “A few company examples” names no company and cites no public material [TO SUPPLY]

Demo sample: the argument, the structure, the per-section points, and the unmeasured evidence are set apart, with gaps left as items to supply. Paste your material to get your version (sign-in required; one credit per run).

WHY YOU CAN TRUST IT

We put “no invented evidence” into our product principles.

Gaps become items to supply

Missing figures and cases are marked to supply with a note on what is needed, never filled with sample numbers.

The argument comes from your material

Every claim in the outline traces back to your source. When the material has no claim, none is invented.

We do not draft the piece

The output is an outline rather than a finished draft, so unverified material never reaches a publishable version.

Content is not stored

Submitted text is used for this single AI request and is not intentionally persisted. See the Privacy Policy.

FAQ

Ask these before you pay.

Will you come up with an argument for me?

No. Whatever the outline claims must be traceable to your material. If you have a topic but no claim, it is written as to confirm, with a note on what would settle it.

What happens to missing data?

It becomes an item to supply, with the required shape spelled out — source, sample, time range. We never pad it with sample figures or placeholder data.

Will you write the article too?

No. The output is an outline: the argument, the structure, the per-section points, and the gap list. You write the draft from it, so nothing unverified reaches a publishable version.

What does one run cost?

One credit per run, usually done in seconds, returning the outline, the reasoning, and items to supply.

Do credits expire?

No. Credits never expire — whatever you do not use carries over to the next cycle instead of resetting.

Is there batch processing or an API?

Not yet. Each run processes one set of material and consumes one credit; there is no bulk upload or API today. Email us with your use case and we will assess it.

Is my content stored?

Not intentionally. Text is used for this single AI request only. See the Privacy Policy.

Which material fits?

Topic notes, research excerpts, interview shorthand, competitor observations, scattered bullet points — Chinese or English, as long as the material was actually written down.

SIMPLE PRICING

Prove the value before you upgrade.

Starter

$9/ month

For an occasional publishing cadence, with a focused monthly credit allocation.

  • 50 optimization credits per monthly renewal
  • Complete GEO analysis
  • Chinese and English output
  • Markdown export

Pro

Recommended$29/ month

For frequent publishers who iterate on content continuously.

  • 250 optimization credits per monthly renewal
  • Complete GEO analysis
  • Chinese and English output
  • Markdown export

Advanced

$79/ month

Our largest monthly credit allocation, for the heaviest continuous usage.

  • 1,000 optimization credits per monthly renewal
  • Complete GEO analysis
  • Chinese and English output
  • Markdown export
Loading localized prices

Credits never expire: unused credits carry over instead of resetting. Credits apply to this site only and are not shared with other sites.

Prices shown are USD baselines; final currency, taxes, and discounts are determined by Paddle for the checkout location.